Reviewers' responsibilities
• Reviewers are required to provide written, competent and unbiased feedback in a timely manner on the scholarly merits and the scientific value of the manuscript.
• Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.
• Reviewers must not have conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and/or the funding sources for the research. If such conflicts exist, the reviewers must report them to the Editor without delay.
• Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor without delay.
• Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. reviewers must not use unpublished materials disclosed in submitted manuscripts without the express written consent of the authors. The information and ideas presented in submitted manuscripts shall be kept confidential and must not be used for personal gain.
Obaveze recenzenta
• Recenzenti su dužni da stručno, argumentovano, nepristrasno i u zadatim rokovima dostave uredniku ocjenu naučne vrijednosti rukopisa.
• Recenzija mora biti objektivna. Komentari koji se tiču ličnosti autora smatraju se neprimjerenim. Sud recenzenata mora biti jasan i potkrepljen argumentima.
• Recenzent ne smije da bude u sukobu interesa sa autorima ili finansijerom istraživanja. Ukoliko postoji sukob interesa, recenzent je dužan da o tome momentalno obavijesti urednika.
• Recenzent koji sebe smatra nekompetentnim za temu ili oblast kojom se rukopis bavi dužan je da o tome obavijesti urednika.
• Rukopisi koji su poslati recenzentu smatraju se povjerljivim dokumentima. Recenzenti ne smeju da koriste neobjavljen materijal iz predatih rukopisa za svoja istraživanja bez izričite pisane dozvole autora, a informacije i ideje iznesene u predatim rukopisima moraju se čuvati kao pojverljive i ne smiju se koristiti za sticanje lične koristi.